Criminal Defense : Family & Divorce Law : Professional License & Maltreatment : Child Protection Defense : Estate Planning : Tax Law : Appeals : Juvenile Defense

Changes are gonna come slowly for MSOP

We did not mention it in our June 20 post, but the federal court opinion that found the Minnesota Sex Offender Program unconstitutional is 37 pages long. Even if it is an interesting read, the length may have surprised some: The judge, the Hon. Donovan Frank, made it clear that the findings and conclusions of law included in the opinion did not address the issues presented by the plaintiffs -- that is, it did not solve the problems MSOP has created for the men and women in the program. Determining that MSOP is unconstitutional just cleared the way for real reform.

The opinion does list more than a dozen potential remedies, but the list is just a start. The real work, Frank wrote, would be accomplished by the attorneys for the detainees and state officials during the remedies phase of the case.

Earlier this month, the parties met with Frank to discuss proposed changes to MSOP. The judge's objective is to have a full proposal, with law changes and budget considerations, ready for the 2016 legislative session. While plaintiffs' attorneys claim the state has dragged its feet complying with Frank's court order, the meeting produced a 30-page memorandum from plaintiffs detailing 18 specific program reforms. The state must submit its own proposals by Sept. 30.

Before we discuss the reforms, let's review how MSOP works -- or, for that matter, doesn't work. It's important to remember that the program is designed for individuals who have committed a sex crime, but it is not a substitute for prison or jail. And while the program serves convicted sex offenders, the Department of Corrections does not manage MSOP. The Department of Human Services does, because, ostensibly, the program's objective is to guide the offenders through a treatment program that will help them re-enter society.

We'll continue this in our next post.

Source: TwinCities.com, "Attorneys for Minnesota's confined sex offenders propose program changes," Tom Olsen, Aug. 19, 2015

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

We Can Help. Contact Us.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Groshek Law PA
530 N 3rd St.
Suite 310
Minneapolis, MN 55401

Phone: 612-424-5829
Phone: 612-424-5829
Minneapolis Law Office Map

Call for a consultation